Simple Agreement For Future Tokens: What it Is and How it Works
Jump to Section
What is a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT)?
A simple agreement for future tokens, or SAFT, is an investment contract offered to accredited investors by cryptocurrency developers. These are specifically designed token sales and are not meant to represent equity in a company. However, they help companies comply with securities regulations while fundraising. The US government classifies cryptocurrency tokens as a type of security, requiring the parties to follow all applicable rules and regulations.
A SAFT is a security since accredited investors offer financing without expecting a future, guaranteed return. When an investor invests in a project, they expect the project’s tokens to sell for a higher price, which allows the investor to profit. The SAFT is used to complete the investment, which satisfies the fundamental requirements and is subject to state and federal securities regulations, depending on the jurisdiction.
This website will show you a SAFT sample via the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SECs).
What is a Token Purchase?
A token purchase is an investment transaction, typically activated by an initial coin offering (ICO), the cryptocurrency’s version of an initial public offering, or IPO. Token purchases are a vehicle for cryptocurrency companies to raise many through accredited investors. These transactions are governed through contracts, such as a token purchase agreement or a private token sale agreement.
How SAFT Agreements Work
SAFT agreements compensate accredited investors for early financing. The cryptocurrency company will issue tokens at a discount or liquidation scenario’s value, similar to convertible notes. The discount price is a single token’s value multiplied by the discount rate during a triggering event.
A SAFT essentially allows the company to defer the valuation of the token. Certain SAFT agreements may have a valuation cap. Thus, when parties raise capital through a SAFT with a valuation cap, they essentially negotiate a valuation.
SAFTs do not need to fall under the balance sheet as a debt. However, suppose the company fails before the cash converts to tokens. In that case, it typically offers to pay the investor an amount equal to the capital investment before paying its shareholders.
What’s Included in a Simple Agreement for Future Tokens (SAFT)?
Negotiating three terms before signing a SAFT is critical, including triggering events, valuation caps, discounts, and pro-rata rights, which are explained below. SAFTs are not all created equal, which means that the terms can make your investment sink or swim. An experienced startup lawyer can assist you in negotiating and drafting these terms.
Here is what you should know about each one and how they affect the investment:
- Trigger Events. Upon triggering an event such as a company sale, initial coin offering (ICO), or merger, future tokens convert to tokens. If the company goes bankrupt or the triggering events never occur, the SAFT is worthless. A future token investment can serve as the trigger. The SAFT investor receives the same number of tokens as prospective investors.
- Valuation Caps. A seed-stage investor takes a significant risk in the early stages. For the investor, a valuation cap resolves this issue. A valuation cap establishes a maximum token value to determine the investor’s ownership percentage. Without a cap on the token’s valuation, the percentage available to the SAFT investor continues to decline as the company’s value increases.
- Discounts. A discount rate provides a deal to the SAFT investor on the value of the tokens at the time of the triggering event. It is a discount from the anticipated price in the future. For example, a discount rate of 80 percent means that the SAFT investor receives their future tokens for 80 percent of the price paid by future investors as an early investment reward.
- Pro-Rata Rights. Pro-rata rights allow the SAFT investor to participate in future fundraising rounds. While this benefits the accredited investor, the company could face issues with future investors if they want the round to themselves. This issue could be exacerbated if the company has granted pro-rata rights to multiple SAFT investors.
SAFT vs. SAFE
A simple agreement for future equity (SAFE), or SAFE agreement, is different from a SAFT. A SAFE agreement is an investment contract that entitles investors to future equity upon triggering a qualifying event, such as a merger, acquisition, or financing round. Basically, instead of receiving tokens like with a SAFT, the SAFE allows the investor to receive equity at a later date. SAFE notes were invented by Y-Combinator, a San Francisco-based startup incubator, and are viewed as a more founder-friendly alternative to convertible notes.
SAFT vs. ICO
SAFTs often work in conjunction with initial coin offerings (ICOs). An ICO involves a project selling its tokens to regular, pre-approved users during the launch. On the other hand, SAFTs deal exclusively with accredited investors. ICOs offer coins upfront where with SAFTs, investors put up funds first and receive new tokens at a later date.
Accredited investors are those who can legally conduct securities transactions. In addition, they meet certain income, net worth, and professional experience requirements. Investor class distinctions enable SAFTs to be classified as a security that satisfies the fundamental requirements of US federal laws.
Image via Pexels by David McBee
Pros and Cons of SAFT Agreements
There are pros and cons of SAFTs for both investors and startups. On the one hand, SAFTs offer the stability and transparency that fiat markets have come to expect. On the other, this level of control could make the industry bristle since it bases its existence on decentralization and freedom from control.
Below, we’ve created a few pros and cons for your consideration when it comes to using SAFT agreements.
3 Pros of SAFTs:
- Potential Standardization. SAFT contracts could result in industry standardization, which would make regulators happy. It would also allow startups to continue using digital token sales to fund the development of their offerings.
- Increased Security. ICO scams would significantly decrease, as SAFT contracts are securities that must go through a vetting process. In addition, the SEC would subject the transactions to regulatory oversight at every point in the process.
- Wider Investor Base. The advantages of SAFT agreements alone could help expand the investor base for token sales. Not only would they provide some level of security for investors, but they also offer transparency that the public wants.
3 Cons of SAFTs:
- Limited Investors. The primary disadvantage of SAFT contracts is that they are only available to accredited investors. This means that small private investors must wait until the token becomes tradable on the secondary market.
- Perception. SAFT contracts may appear to work against the crypto movement. The entire premise of crypto and digital currencies is to move toward independence and freedom. Some people may push back against their becoming a standardized element.
- Limited Reach. SAFTs were based on the federal laws of the United States. Therefore, they may not gain as much global participation due to a lack of international applicability.
SAFT agreements are a new investment vehicle that assures compliance with US securities laws. They are both simple and effective but should be negotiated and considered carefully with a startup attorney. Regardless of your role, your lawyer can assist you in negotiating and understanding these terms so that it is a meaningful transaction for both parties.
Post a project in ContractsCounsel’s marketplace to get flat fee bids from lawyers for your legal project. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer-reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
ContractsCounsel is not a law firm, and this post should not be considered and does not contain legal advice. To ensure the information and advice in this post are correct, sufficient, and appropriate for your situation, please consult a licensed attorney. Also, using or accessing ContractsCounsel's site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and ContractsCounsel.
Meet some of our Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
Richard G.
Hello! I am an Iowa native trying to bring some Midwest problem-solving to southern civil law. I thoroughly enjoy getting to know the individuals and businesses I assist. I practice estate planning and business formation and, with my litigation experience in mind, I help clients plan to ensure they and their interests are protected in the future.
Danielle G.
Danielle Giovannone is the principal of Danielle D. Giovannone Law Office. In her experience, Danielle has found that many business do not require in-house legal counsel, but still need outside counsel that knows their business just as well as in-house counsel. This need inspired Danielle to start her firm. Before starting her firm, Danielle served as Contracts Counsel at Siena College and as an attorney at the New York City Department of Education, Office of the General Counsel. At the NYCDOE, she served as lead counsel negotiating and drafting large-scale commercial agreements, including contracts with major technology firms on behalf of the school district. Prior to the NYCDOE, Danielle worked as an associate at a small corporate and securities law firm, where she gained hands-on experience right out of law school. Danielle has provided legal and policy advice on intellectual property and data privacy matters, as well as corporate law, formation and compliance, employer liability, insurance, regulatory matters, general municipal matters and non-profit issues. Danielle holds a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law and a B.S. from Cornell University. She is active in her Capital District community providing pro bono services to the Legal Project, and has served as Co-Chair to the Niskayuna Co-op Nursery School and Vice President of Services to the Craig Elementary School Parent Teacher Organization. Danielle is a member of the New York State Bar Association.
"Danielle is easy to work with, professional and knowledgeable."
Michael J.
Combining extensive experience in litigation and as general counsel for a real estate and private equity company, I provide ongoing guidance and support to clients on a variety of transactional matters, including business formation, partnership agreements, corporate agreements, commercial and residential leasing, and employment issues.
"Michael did an excellent job. I will hire him again. Thank you!"
Anand A.
Anand is an entrepreneur and attorney with a wide-ranging background. In his legal capacity, Anand has represented parties in (i) commercial finance, (ii) corporate, and (iii) real estate matters throughout the country, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Arizona, and Georgia. He is well-versed in business formation and management, reviewing and negotiating contracts, advising clients on financing strategy, and various other arenas in which individuals and businesses commonly find themselves. As an entrepreneur, Anand is involved in the hospitality industry and commercial real estate. His approach to the legal practice is to treat clients fairly and provide the highest quality representation possible. Anand received his law degree from Rutgers University School of Law in 2013 and his Bachelor of Business Administration from Pace University, Lubin School of Business in 2007.
"Anand was a pleasure to work with! He was very thorough and professional."
Christopher M.
I am a corporate attorney with several years of experience with contracts, corporate and business, government projects, and employment law.
"Chris helped us put together a quick SaaS contract. HE is very nice and professional."
July 8, 2022
AHAJI A.
Ahaji Amos, PLLC is a Houston-based intellectual property and civil litigation firm servicing clients throughout the U.S.
April 18, 2024
Gayle G.
Fractional General Counsel and Board Advisor with over 26 years of experience advising companies and their management in the US, EMEA and APAC. I use my legal and finance background to understand the client's business and bring the most practical, efficient legal solutions to grow the business while reducing risk. Focus includes: Compliance | Governance (including AI) | Tech Transactions | Licenses | SaaS | Cross Border | Equity Investments | JVs | International Expansion | Fractional GC https://www.linkedin.com/in/ggorvettesq
Find the best lawyer for your project
Browse Lawyers Now
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
View Trustpilot ReviewHow It Works
Financial lawyers by top cities
- Austin Financial Lawyers
- Boston Financial Lawyers
- Chicago Financial Lawyers
- Dallas Financial Lawyers
- Denver Financial Lawyers
- Houston Financial Lawyers
- Los Angeles Financial Lawyers
- New York Financial Lawyers
- Phoenix Financial Lawyers
- San Diego Financial Lawyers
- Tampa Financial Lawyers
Simple Agreement For Future Tokens lawyers by city
- Austin Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Boston Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Chicago Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Dallas Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Denver Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Houston Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Los Angeles Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- New York Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Phoenix Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- San Diego Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
- Tampa Simple Agreement For Future Tokens Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
View Trustpilot Review
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
View Trustpilot Review
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
View Trustpilot Review